University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; Columbia University - Law School; King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law
October 13, 2013
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, (2013), pp. 1-15
Contains responses to comments by Chang, Hestein and Heuer on "From Normativity to Responsibility". The paper responds to various criticisms especially about methodology, the bearing of a secure area of competence on responsibility, the univocality of 'reasons', the relations of value and practical reasons, the scope of rational powers, the function of reasons to be rational, and most extensively about following reasons and the distinction between standard and non-standard reasons (where Heuer has pointed out some deficiencies in the discussion of the matter in the book).
Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2339773>. Acesso em 25 maio 2014.
