Páginas

segunda-feira, 22 de agosto de 2016

The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization

Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

August 15, 2016


Abstract:
The new posture of international courts and tribunals is the ‘spirit of systemic harmonisation’, to use the words of the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in Al Dulimi. Fifteen years after then ICJ President’s Gilbert Guillaume’s ‘proliferation’-speech before the UN General Assembly and ten years after publication of the ILC ‘fragmentation’-report, it is time to bury the f-word. Along that line, this paper concentrates on the positive contribution of the new techniques which courts, tribunals and other actors have developed in order to coordinate the various subfields of international law. If these are accompanied by a proper politicization of international law and governance, they are apt to strengthen both the effectiveness and the legitimacy of international law. Ironically, the ongoing ‘harmonisation’ and ‘integration’ within international law could also be conceptualised as a form of procedural constitutionalisation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2823512>. Acesso em 19 ago. 2016.