tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45698695162678161172024-03-19T00:32:47.420-03:00DIREITO INTERNACIONALEste blog é uma ferramenta de comunicação com meus alunos e outras pessoas interessadas em Direito Internacional.
Sou professor da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (UEMA) e Bacharel (UFMA), Mestre (UFSC) e Doutor (UERJ) em Direito.
Queridos visitantes, ao comentar, por gentileza informem nome, sobrenome e instituição de origem.
Obrigado por acessar e sejam bem-vindos!
Rodrigo Bastos Raposo (29/08/2022).Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.comBlogger453125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-23051589501263199512022-08-29T10:32:00.000-03:002022-08-29T10:32:04.912-03:00Peremptory Norms and Fundamental Values<p style="text-align: center;"> Adil Ahmad Haque</p><p style="text-align: center;">Rutgers Law School; Rutgers Law School</p><p style="text-align: center;">Date Written: August 16, 2022</p><p><b>Abstract</b></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The International Law Commission recently adopted a set of draft conclusions and commentaries on peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens). It’s quite likely that the ILC’s work will be widely viewed as a definitive restatement of the law in this area. But the conclusions are at best ambiguous about what holds this area of law together. And, on balance, the commentaries tend to favor the view that non-derogability lies at the center of it all, explaining characteristics like hierarchical superiority and universal applicability, as well as consequences like the invalidity of conflicting rules. That’s the view I will reject.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">My basic claim will be that peremptory norms—their characteristics, their consequences, and their content—are best explained by their moral function of reflecting and protecting the fundamental values of the international community. In contrast, the formal characteristic of non-derogability is a consequence of this moral function, rather than a basic or fundamental feature. This understanding makes us better positivists, because we better understand what this human artifact is for, how its various features enable it to perform its function, and why the dynamic process through which international law navigates its own uncertainties invites normative argument into legal reasoning. Since peremptory norms underwrite the unity of the international legal order, this understanding places consensus and contestation over fundamental values at the very heart of international law.</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> Peremptory norms, jus cogens, international law</p><p>HAQUE, Adil Ahmad. Peremptory Norms and Fundamental Values (August 16, 2022). <b>Rutgers Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series</b>. Disponível em: <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=4192022">https://ssrn.com/abstract=4192022</a>. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2022.</p><div><br /></div>Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-64522347072819255762021-02-10T10:00:00.018-03:002021-02-10T10:00:04.211-03:00Legal Consequences of Serious Breaches of Peremptory Norms in the Law of State Responsibility: Observations in the Light of the Recent Work of the International Law Commission<p style="text-align: center;">Dire Tladi (ed.), Peremptory Norms of General International Law: Perspectives and Future Prospects (Brill Nijhoff, forthcoming 2021).</p><p style="text-align: center;">23 Pages Posted:</p><p style="text-align: center;"><b>Helmut Aust</b></p><p style="text-align: center;">Freie Universität Berlin</p><p style="text-align: center;">Date Written: February 8, 2021</p><p><b>Abstract</b></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The paper deals with the legal consequences of serious breaches of peremptory norms under general international law. After setting out some aspects of the complex relationship between jus cogens and the law of state responsibility, the contribution presents the recent work of the UN International Law Commission (ILC) on these questions. This work is contextualized in the light of the debates in the Sixth Committee of the UN General Assembly. The contribution discusses to what extent the Commission has offered the international community of States merely an ‘effort to imagine’ hypothetical consequences of breaches of jus cogens – or whether the special consequences for serious breaches of peremptory norms of general international law are now indeed firmly accepted in international law. In particular, the paper assesses recent practice with respect to the three additional consequences that the ILC included in the Articles on State Responsibility in 2001 – the obligation of cooperation as well as the obligations to refrain from recognizing situations brought about by serious breaches of peremptory norms as lawful and to render aid or assistance for maintaining such situations.</p><p><b>Suggested Citation</b></p><p>AUST, Helmut. Legal Consequences of Serious Breaches of Peremptory Norms in the Law of State Responsibility: Observations in the Light of the Recent Work of the International Law Commission (February 8, 2021). Dire Tladi (ed.), <b>Peremptory Norms of General International Law</b>: Perspectives and Future Prospects (Brill Nijhoff, forthcoming 2021). Disponível em: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3781855>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2021.</p><p><br /></p>Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-570002048719591572020-07-06T08:00:00.001-03:002021-02-10T08:43:16.020-03:00SCOTUS grants two important Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act cases: Hungary v. Simon and Germany v. PhilippA Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos decidiu dois importantes casos sobre imunidade de jurisdição.<br /> Seguem resumos e links.<br /> <br /><b> Republic of Hungary v. Simon</b><br /> Issue: Whether a district court may abstain from exercising jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act for reasons of international comity, in a matter in which former Hungarian nationals have sued the nation of Hungary to recover the value of property lost in Hungary during World War II but the plaintiffs made no attempt to exhaust local Hungarian remedies.<br /> <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/republic-of-hungary-v-simon/</a><br /> <br /><b> Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp</b><br /> Issues: (1) Whether the “expropriation exception” of the <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act</a>, which abrogates foreign sovereign immunity when “rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue,” provides jurisdiction over claims that a foreign sovereign has violated international human-rights law when taking property from its own national within its own borders, even though such claims do not implicate the established international law governing states’ responsibility for takings of property; and (2) whether the doctrine of international comity is unavailable in cases against foreign sovereigns, even in cases of considerable historical and political significance to the foreign sovereign, and even when the foreign nation has a domestic framework for addressing the claims.<br /> <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/federal-republic-of-germany-v-philipp/</a><br /> <br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-89908775774184389782020-05-18T08:00:00.000-03:002020-05-18T08:00:08.564-03:00Comparative Method and International Litigation<div style="text-align: center;">
Journal of Dispute Resolution, Forthcoming</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2020-03</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
31 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2020</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Ronald A. Brand</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Date Written: February 4, 2020</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<b>Abstract</b><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In this article, resulting from a presentation at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Comparative Law, I apply comparative method to international litigation. I do so from the perspective of a U.S.-trained lawyer who has been involved for over 25 years in the negotiations that produced both the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. The law of jurisdiction and judgments recognition is probably most often taught in a litigation context. Nonetheless, that law has as much or more importance to the transaction planning lawyer as to the litigator, and affects my focus here for comparative study of developments both in the Hague Conference process and in national (and regional) legal systems during the negotiation of the two treaties with which I have been involved. I look not only at domestic law, but also at treaties and other international legal instruments–the comparative evolution of the law. Moreover, I look at both legal rules and legal systems, addressing the comparative evolution of the institutions that make the law. This includes a comparison of the most influential legal systems at the start of the Hague negotiations. The differences resulting from that comparison ultimately affected the focus of the negotiations and the text of the resulting legal instruments. I end with a set of four conclusions based on these observations and comparisons.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
REFERÊNCIA<br />
Brand, Ronald A. Comparative Method and International Litigation (February 4, 2020). <b>Journal of Dispute Resolution</b>, Forthcoming; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2020-03. Disponível em: <<a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3532035">https://ssrn.com/abstract=3532035</a>>. Acesso em: 17 mail 2020.<br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-72734995908292412682019-11-27T08:00:00.000-03:002019-11-27T08:00:08.574-03:00Koskenniemi: International Law and the Far Right: Reflections on Law and Cynicism<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKvALJABK0XcXB8XUrJJs8_a96gtHQ9qHA-Zj1Ysn1VyzsMS1_BwnHNn-WR-fW4J9vX6HYzRs87F1XPrNBy9cJFWsUhLQCaBVosDB96SlM-J_0j4TKLeArrlQ8BBEwbTK4cp5vme1VIvSs/s1600/Koskenniemi.jpg" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKvALJABK0XcXB8XUrJJs8_a96gtHQ9qHA-Zj1Ysn1VyzsMS1_BwnHNn-WR-fW4J9vX6HYzRs87F1XPrNBy9cJFWsUhLQCaBVosDB96SlM-J_0j4TKLeArrlQ8BBEwbTK4cp5vme1VIvSs/s400/Koskenniemi.jpg" width="260" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/20191121T165243-Koskenniemi_web.pdf">Aperte aqui para baixar o livro.</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Martti Koskenniemi (Univ. of Helsinki - Law) has published <a href="https://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/20191121T165243-Koskenniemi_web.pdf">International Law and the Far Right: Reflections on Law and Cynicism</a> (Fourth Annual T.M.C. Asser Lecture). Here's the abstract:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Since the emergence of the profession in the 1870s, international lawyers have lent themselves to supporting various political projects, from ruling of empire to decolonisation, from supporting national self-determination to arguing in favour of global governance of the transnational economy. They have celebrated sovereignty and supported human rights.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The recent backlash against global rule and the international institutions of the liberal 1990s, should be viewed as a political attack from a relatively privileged part of the world on the system of values and distributive power that have governed post-1968 internationalism. This backlash is often treated as a social pathology, arisen from the anger felt by European and American middle classes “left behind” by globalisation.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I do not share this analysis. Whatever the social composition of the “backlash”, the policies of its leaders are neither reformist nor “conservative”. They are reactionary, and the question is, how to devise an effective policy to counter them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The coming struggle will be about whether reactionary, colonialist, white and male supremacist values will play a role in the international world after globalisation. If international law is not to become a servant to far right policies, or fall into irrelevance, it had better sharpen its strategic insights. Alongside self-criticism, this involves taking a break from the interminable production of minor reforms. Greater openness is needed. Not to “populist” leaders, but to problems of global inequality.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Disponível em: <<a href="http://ilreports.blogspot.com/2019/11/koskenniemi-international-law-and-far.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FRfRRI+%28International+Law+Reporter%29">http://ilreports.blogspot.com/2019/11/koskenniemi-international-law-and-far.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FRfRRI+%28International+Law+Reporter%29</a>>. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2019.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-47235946948059683092019-11-26T08:00:00.000-03:002019-11-26T08:00:06.878-03:00The Trade – (Cyber)security Dilemma and Its Impact on Global Cybersecurity Governance<div style="text-align: center;">
Journal of World Trade (Forthcoming); Centre for International Law Working Paper Series 19/05</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
21 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Neha Mishra</b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Centre for International Law, National University of Singapore; University of Melbourne, Law School, Students</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Date Written: November 19, 2019</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Abstract</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Governments are adopting various measures to address cybersecurity-related concerns. Some of these measures restrict cross-border flows of digital services/data, and thus inconsistent with obligations in trade agreements such as General Agreement on Trade in Services (‘GATS’). However, certain governments might argue that such measures are justified under the GATS security exception (art XIVbis) as they protect national security. This article investigates whether GATS art XIVbis is relevant in justifying cybersecurity measures and its potential impact on cybersecurity governance. It argues that GATS art XIVbis has limited relevance, and is potentially problematic, when used in justifying majority of cybersecurity measures. First, a large majority of cybersecurity measures do not fall within the limited set of exceptional circumstances listed in GATS art XIVbis. Further, in applying this exception to cybersecurity measures, WTO Panels will be unfairly forced to balance trade and security interests in an environment of political, technological and policy uncertainty. Given these practical limitations and the normative boundaries of GATS art XIVbis, countries must avoid casually relying upon security exceptions as a basis for adopting/implementing unilateral measures on cybersecurity, but rather engage in meaningful cyber-diplomacy and regulatory cooperation mechanisms to resolve their differences on cybersecurity governance.</div>
<br />
<b>Referência</b><br />
MISHRA, Neha. The Trade – (Cyber)security Dilemma and Its Impact on Global Cybersecurity Governance (November 19, 2019). <b>Journal of World Trade</b> (Forthcoming); <b>Centre for International Law Working Paper Series</b> 19/05. Disponível em: <https: abstract="3491122" ssrn.com="">. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2019.</https:><br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-1851363412073288672019-11-25T19:00:00.002-03:002019-11-25T19:00:07.901-03:00ÉTICA E LEGISLAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: Ética na advocacia<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Bom dia!<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Este post
é uma atividade para a turma de Ética e Legislação Profissional (2019.2) do
Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vamos
trabalhar a seguinte temática: </span><b><span style="font-family: "cambria" , serif;">Ética
na advocacia (autonomia, sigilo e publicidade), processo disciplinar, órgãos componentes
da ordem dos advogados</span></b><span style="font-family: "cambria" , serif;">.</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Proponho
a seguinte questão para discussão: A seu ver, qual é o principal desafio ético ao
exercício da profissão de advogado? Justifique a sua resposta.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vocês devem
discutir o assunto e registrar sua participação fundamentada, individual ou em
equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Essa
atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;"><b>Instruções
para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">1)
publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">2)
durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">3)
os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">4) o
prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a
mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">5)
avisem se houver outras dúvidas.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-66058832766055120972019-11-25T19:00:00.001-03:002019-11-25T19:00:01.042-03:00RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL: Despatrimonialização da responsabilidade civil<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Bom dia!<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Este post
é uma atividade para a turma de Responsabilidade Civil (2019.2) do Curso de
Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vamos
trabalhar o seguinte artigo científico:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">MILAGRES,
Marcelo de Oliveira. Breves notas sobre a (des)patrimonialização da
responsabilidade civil: ainda a fundamentalidade do dano. In: ROSENVALD,
Nelson; MILAGRES, Marcelo. <b>Responsabilidade Civil</b>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Novas Tendências. Indaiatuba: Foco, 2018.
583p. p. 189-196.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Proponho
a seguinte questão para discussão: É possível configurar-se a responsabilidade
civil sem dano? Justifique sua resposta.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vocês devem
discutir o artigo e registrar sua participação fundamentada, individual ou em
equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Essa
atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.</span></div>
</div>
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-72930750537368398782019-11-25T19:00:00.000-03:002019-11-25T19:00:03.862-03:00DIREITO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO: Execução de sentenças internacionais no BrasilBom dia!<br />
<br />
Este post é uma atividade para a turma de Direito Internacional Público (2019.2) do Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<br />
<br />
Vamos trabalhar o seguinte artigo científico:<br />
SOUZA, Nevitton Vieira. Jurisdição internacional e as dificuldades de execução de sentenças internacionais no Brasil. <b>Revista de Direito Internacional</b>, v. 15, n. 3, 2018. p. 391-403. Disponível em: <<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i3.5654">http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i3.5654</a>>. Acesso em 11 nov. 2019.<br />
<br />
Proponho a seguinte questão para discussão: Quais as principais dificuldades para a execução de sentenças internacionais no foro brasileiro? Justifique a sua posição.<br />
<br />
Vocês devem discutir o artigo e registrar sua opinião fundamentada, individual ou em equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<br />
<br />
Essa atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-65898422501765198862019-11-18T19:00:00.002-03:002019-11-18T19:00:08.184-03:00ÉTICA E LEGISLAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: Contrato de prestação de serviços advocatícios<span style="font-family: "times new roman", serif; font-size: 12pt;">Bom dia!</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Este post
é uma atividade para a turma de Ética e Legislação Profissional (2019.2) do
Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vamos
trabalhar a seguinte temática: </span><b><span style="font-family: "cambria" , serif;">Advocacia:
instrumento de mandato, honorários, contrato de prestação de serviço, sociedade
de advogados, advogado empregado</span></b><span style="font-family: "cambria" , serif;">.</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Proponho
a seguinte questão para discussão: Escolha, e explique uma cláusula do contrato
de prestação de serviços advocatícios.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vocês devem
discutir o assunto e registrar sua participação fundamentada, individual ou em
equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Essa
atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br /></div>
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com13tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-52999942103063439282019-11-18T19:00:00.001-03:002019-11-18T19:00:06.665-03:00RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL: ruptura de negociações contratuais<span style="font-family: "times new roman", serif; font-size: 12pt;">Bom dia!</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Este post
é uma atividade para a turma de Responsabilidade Civil (2019.2) do Curso de
Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vamos
trabalhar o seguinte artigo científico:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">FRITZ,
Karina Nunes. A responsabilidade pré-contratual por ruptura injustificada das
negociações. In: ROSENVALD, Nelson; MILAGRES, Marcelo. <b>Responsabilidade
Civil</b>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Novas Tendências. Indaiatuba:
Foco, 2018. 583p. p. 175-187.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Proponho
a seguinte questão para discussão: Destaque e explique um dos requisitos para
configuração da responsabilização civil por ruptura das negociações contratuais.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vocês devem
discutir o artigo e registrar sua participação fundamentada, individual ou em
equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Essa
atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-36570980376750901562019-11-18T19:00:00.000-03:002019-11-18T19:00:05.967-03:00DIREITO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO: Imunidade jurisdicional das organizações internacionaisBom dia!<br />
<br />
Este post é uma atividade para a turma de Direito Internacional Público (2019.2) do Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<br />
<br />
Vamos trabalhar o seguinte artigo científico:<br />
KALLÁS E CAETANO, Fernanda Araújo. A imunidade de jurisdição das organizações internacionais face ao direito de acesso à justiça. <b>Revista de Direito Internacional</b>, v. 13, n. 3, 2016. p. 391-403. Disponível em: <<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi/bjil.v13i3.4242">http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi/bjil.v13i3.4242</a>>. Acesso em 11 nov. 2019.<br />
<br />
Proponho a seguinte questão para discussão: Você considera que a existência de alternativas para a solução de disputas judiciais é um requisito para que os tribunais do foro reconheçam a imunidade jurisdicional de uma organização internacional? Justifique a sua posição.<br />
<br />
Vocês devem discutir o artigo e registrar sua opinião fundamentada, individual ou em equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<br />
<br />
Essa atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-47094660645798404762019-11-12T00:18:00.001-03:002019-11-15T17:46:08.932-03:00ÉTICA E LEGISLAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL - Prerrogativas da Advocacia<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Bom dia!<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Este post
é uma atividade para a turma de Ética e Legislação Profissional (2019.2) do
Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vamos
trabalhar a seguinte temática: </span><b><span style="font-family: "cambria" , serif;">Advocacia:
regulamentação legal da advocacia, exercício, inscrição, atos privativos,
direitos e poderes</span></b><span style="font-family: "cambria" , serif;">.</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Proponho
a seguinte questão para discussão: Escolha e caracterize uma das prerrogativas dos
advogados e destaque a sua importância para o desempenho de seu múnus público.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vocês devem
discutir o tema e registrar sua participação fundamentada, individual ou em
equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Essa
atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;"><b>Instruções
para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">1)
publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">2)
durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">3)
os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">4) o
prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a
mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">5)
avisem se houver outras dúvidas.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com11tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-52591621089437164972019-11-11T23:46:00.000-03:002019-11-15T17:46:32.649-03:00RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL: agravada pelo risco/perigo<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Bom dia!<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Este post
é uma atividade para a turma de Responsabilidade Civil (2019.2) do Curso de
Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vamos
trabalhar o seguinte artigo científico:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">TEIXEIRA
NETO, Felipe. Responsabilidade civil agravada pelo risco/perigo da atividade:
um diálogo entre os sistemas jurídicos italiano e brasileiro. In: ROSENVALD,
Nelson; MILAGRES, Marcelo. <b>Responsabilidade Civil</b>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Novas Tendências. Indaiatuba: Foco, 2018.
583p. p. 163-174.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Proponho
a seguinte questão para discussão: Da comparação entre os sistemas jurídicos,
qual o aspecto mais relevante? Justifique a sua posição.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Vocês devem
discutir o artigo e registrar sua opinião fundamentada, individual ou em
equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12.0pt;">Essa
atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.</span></div>
</div>
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-33709683897589036062019-11-11T22:51:00.000-03:002019-11-15T17:45:47.853-03:00DIREITO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO: O caso Zahra Kazemi v. República Islâmica do Irã<div>
Bom dia!</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Este post é uma atividade para a turma de Direito Internacional Público (2019.2) do Curso de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Maranhão.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Vamos trabalhar o seguinte artigo científico:</div>
<div>
ABREU, Patrícia Maria Lara; RAPOSO, Rodrigo Bastos. Imunidade de jurisdição do Estado e reparação civil pela prática de tortura: o caso Zahra Kazemi v. República Islâmica do Irã. <b>Revista de Direito Internacional</b>, v. 11, n. 2, 2014. p. 412-434. Disponível em: <<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v11i2.2917">http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v11i2.2917</a>><http: dx.doi.org="" rdi.v11i2.2917="">. Acesso em 11 nov. 2019.</http:></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Proponho a seguinte questão para discussão: Você considera acertada a decisão dos tribunais canadenses? Justifique a sua posição.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Vocês devem discutir o caso e registrar sua opinião fundamentada, individual ou em equipes com até quatro integrantes, nos comentários a esta postagem.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Essa atividade integra a terceira avaliação da disciplina.<br />
<br />
<b>Instruções para a 3ª avaliação:</b><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman", serif; font-size: 12pt;">1) publicarei três postagens nos dias 11, 18 e 25 de novembro;</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">2) durante o mês, espero que cada aluno ou equipe (até 4 pessoas) faça pelo menos um comentário;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">3) os comentários devem possuir de 100 a 200 palavras;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">4) o prazo para comentar cada postagem vai até a sexta-feira da semana em que a mesma foi publicada;<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif; font-size: 12pt;">5) avisem se houver outras dúvidas.</span></div>
</div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-16996446471698774192019-11-05T08:00:00.000-03:002019-11-05T08:00:09.368-03:00The International Law Commission in a Mirror - Forms, Impact and Authority<div style="text-align: justify;">
This chapter is a contribution to a forthcoming edited volume on the seventieth anniversary of the International Law Commission.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
20 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Laurence Boisson de Chazournes</b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
University of Geneva - Faculty of Law - Department of Public International Law; Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IHEID) - Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement (CIDS)</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Date Written: September 25, 2019</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Abstract</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In its 70 years of existence, the International Law Commission has accomplished sterling work in many respects. Much of its output is considered to be the cornerstone of the contemporary international legal order.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, this positive note should not distract attention from the challenges facing the Commission. Among these, the end of the “golden era” of codification, and the phenomenon of treaty fatigue call into question the relatively comfortable position of the International Law Commission. Questions arise: Is the progressive reduction in the number of conventions adopted as a result of the Commission’s work a sign of its decline? Is the increasing diversity of instruments used by the Commission a problem in terms of impact?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
To answer these questions, this contribution first deals with the diversity of forms of the final products and the questions this diversity raises in terms of legal effects (II.) Once this framework for analyzing the Commission’s work has been established, its impacts are examined (III.). The contribution then focuses on the users of the Commission’s work (IV.), and also shed light on its authority (V.).</div>
<br />
<b>REFERÊNCIA</b><br />
BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, Laurence. <b>The International Law Commission in a Mirror</b> - Forms, Impact and Authority (September 25, 2019). This chapter is a contribution to a forthcoming edited volume on the seventieth anniversary of the International Law Commission. Disponível em: <<a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3470773">https://ssrn.com/abstract=3470773</a>>. Acesso em: 04 nov. 2019.<br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-28541503851080614472019-10-24T08:00:00.000-03:002019-10-24T08:00:04.328-03:00An Empirical Study on European Family and Succession Law (EUFams II)<div style="text-align: justify;">
Texto extraído de <a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/">http://conflictoflaws.net/</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
by MATTHIAS WELLER on OCTOBER 11, 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
by Thomas Pfeiffer, University of Heidelberg</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
EUFams II is a study funded by the European Commission with the objective of assessing the functioning and the effectiveness of European family and succession law. The project is coordinated by the Institute for Comparative Law, Conflict of Laws and International Business Law of Heidelberg University (Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Thomas Pfeiffer). Project partners are the Universities of Lund, Milan, Osijek, Valencia and Verona as well as the MPI Luxemburg. The two-year project entails various conferences and research activities, which will be completed by 31 August 2020.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A survey conducted in the first phase of EUFams II generated responses of approximately 1,400 professionals from 17 Member States. The main findings of the survey are presented in a <a href="http://www2.ipr.uni-heidelberg.de/eufams/index-Dateien/microsites/download.php?art=projektbericht&id=2">report (with executive summary)</a> drafted by Quincy C. Lobach and Tobias Rapp (Heidelberg University).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The results show a striking lack of overall familiarity with the instruments of European family and succession law. Respondents indicated that the legal framework is characterized by a high degree of complexity due to the multitude of instruments. Further matters include private divorces, party autonomy, and the impact of global migration flows and the so-called refugee crisis.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
More information on EUFams II and its future research outputs can be found on the <a href="http://www2.ipr.uni-heidelberg.de/eufams/index.php?lang=en">project’s website</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This project was funded by the European Union’s Justice Programme (2014-2020). The content of this study represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.</div>
<br />Disponível em: <<a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/an-empirical-study-on-european-family-and-succession-law-eufams-ii/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29">http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/an-empirical-study-on-european-family-and-succession-law-eufams-ii/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29</a>>. Acesso em 23 out. 2019.</div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-85820095747230301312019-09-06T08:00:00.000-03:002019-09-06T08:00:02.040-03:00Two new resolutions by the Institut de Droit Internationalby MATTHIAS WELLER on SEPTEMBER 3, 2019<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In its session in The Hague on 31 August 2019, the Institut de Droit International/Institute of International Law passed two highly relevant resolutions:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Firstly, the resolution on “Internet and the Infringement of Privacy” adopted by the 8th Commission (Rapporteurs: Erik Jayme and Symeon Symeonides) focuses on numerous yet unresolved issues of jurisdiction, applicable law and the enforcement of foreign judgments. For example, the Commission rejects a ‘mosaic’ approach for internet-related tortious claims. Instead, it proposes a “holistic principle” that would allow a person to seek redress for injuries in a single state even if the injuries have occurred or may occur in another state. Moreover, the resolution puts forward a rather sophisticated choice of law rule:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In the absence of a choice-of-law agreement valid under Article 8, the applicable law shall be determined as follows:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the court’s jurisdiction is based on paragraph 1(a) of Article 5, the applicable law shall be the internal law of the forum State.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the court’s jurisdiction is based on paragraph 1(b) of Article 5, the applicable law shall be the internal law of the forum State. However, if, at the time of the injury, the defendant’s home is located in another state, the applicable law shall be the internal law of the state that, considering all the circumstances, has the closest and most significant connection.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the court’s jurisdiction is based on paragraph 1(c) of Article 5, the applicable law shall be the internal law of the forum State. However, if the aggrieved person proves that the critical conduct of the person claimed to be liable occurred in another State, the internal law of the latter State shall govern all substantive issues, provided that the aggrieved person formally requests the application of that law and, upon request by the court, establishes the content of that law.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the court’s jurisdiction is based on paragraph 1(d) of Article 5, the applicable law shall be the internal law of the forum State. However, if the person claimed to be liable proves that the most extensive injurious effects occurred in another State, the internal law of the latter State shall govern all substantive issues, provided that that person formally requests the application of that law and, upon request by the court, establishes the content of that law.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the court’s jurisdiction is based on a valid choice-of-court agreement and that court is located in a State referred to in Article 5, the applicable law is determined as provided in paragraphs 1–4 of Article 7, whichever is applicable. If the court is located in a State other than the States referred to in Article 5, the applicable law shall be the law of the State which, considering all circumstances, has the closest and most significant connection.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Finally, the recognition and enforcement of judgments in line with the resolution’s standards shall be subject to conditions identical to the ones introduced in the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Secondly, the 18th Commission’s (Rapporteur: Campbell McLachlan) resolution on “Equality of Parties before International Investment Tribunals” deals with one of the most fundamental elements of the rule of law that ensures a fair system of adjudication. The first part of the resolution tackles issues of party equality at the stage of the establishment of the arbitral tribunal (such as access to a tribunal, the indispensable requirement of impartiality, and the tribunal’s composition), the second part is devoted to equality during the proceedings (e.g., the treatment of multiple claims and counterclaims, rules on pleading and evidence, and costs).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The resolutions can be accessed <a href="http://www.idi-iil.org/en/sessions/la-haye-2019/?post_type=publication">here</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Copiado de: <a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/">http://conflictoflaws.net/</a>. Acesso em: 05 set. 2019.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-26813739786605892982019-07-29T08:00:00.000-03:002019-07-29T08:00:01.785-03:00How to Identify Customary International Law? – On the Final Outcome of the Work of the International Law Commission (2018)<div style="text-align: center;">
KFG Working Paper Series, No. 37, Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?”, June 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
22 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Georg Nolte</b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Humboldt University Berlin</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Date Written: June 2019</div>
<br />
<b>Abstract</b><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
How to identify customary international law is an important question of international law. The International Law Commission has in 2018 adopted a set of sixteen conclusions, together with commentaries, on this topic. The paper consists of three parts: First, the reasons are discussed why the Commission came to work on the topic “Identification of customary international law”. Then, some of its conclusions are highlighted. Finally, the outcome of the work of the Commission is placed in a general context, before concluding.</div>
<br />
Referência<br />
NOLTE, Georg. How to Identify Customary International Law? – On the Final Outcome of the Work of the International Law Commission (2018) (June 2019). <b>KFG Working Paper Series</b>, No. 37, Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?”, June 2019. Disponível em: <<a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3402384">https://ssrn.com/abstract=3402384</a>>.<br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-68039265904111598542019-07-05T08:00:00.000-03:002019-07-05T08:00:03.795-03:00Text of the 2019 Judgments Convention of the Hague Conference is now available online<div style="text-align: justify;">
by THOMAS JOHN on JULY 3, 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Posted on behalf of the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The full text of the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters is now available online. The HCCH released the text of the Convention on its website.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
You can it find it <a href="https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=137">here</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Additional information, including the final version of the Explanatory Report to the Convention will be available soon.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Notícia disponível em: <<a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/text-of-the-2019-judgments-convention-of-the-hague-conference-is-now-available-online/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29">http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/text-of-the-2019-judgments-convention-of-the-hague-conference-is-now-available-online/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29</a>>. Acesso em 04 jul. 2019.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-67862986315327704122019-06-18T08:00:00.000-03:002019-06-18T08:00:06.271-03:00Singapore Court of Appeal Affirms Party Autonomy in Choice of Court Agreements<div style="text-align: justify;">
Publicado em: <<a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/">http://conflictoflaws.net/</a>>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
By ADELINE CHONG on JUNE 14, 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Professor <b>Yeo Tiong Min</b>, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Professor of Law at Singapore Management University, has kindly provided the following report:</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
“The Singapore Court of Appeal has recently affirmed the significance of giving effect to party autonomy in the enforcement of choice of court agreements under the common law in three important decisions handed down in quick succession, on different aspects of the matter: the legal effect of exclusive choice of court agreements, the interpretation and effect of non-exclusive choice of court agreements, and the effect of exclusive choice of court agreements on anti-suit injunctions.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd v PTT International Trading Pte Ltd [2018] SGCA 65, proceedings were commenced in Singapore in respect of an alleged breach of a commercial sale contract containing an exclusive choice of English court agreement. The agreement was dated before the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements took effect in English law, so the Convention was not engaged. Like many other common law countries, the Singapore courts would give effect to the agreement unless strong cause can be demonstrated by the party seeking to breach the agreement. A complication arose because there had been four previous decisions of the Court of Appeal in the shipping context where proceedings had been allowed to continue in Singapore in the face of an exclusive choice of foreign court agreement because the court had found that the defence was devoid of merits. The claimant’s argument that based on these decisions the Singapore court should hear the case because there was no valid defence to its claim succeeded before the High Court.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Sitting as a coram of five on the basis of the significance of the issue, the Court of Appeal unanimously reversed the decision. It decided that the merits of the case were not a relevant consideration at the stage where the court was determining whether to exercise its jurisdiction, and departed from its previous decisions to the extent that they stood to the contrary. While affirming the continuing validity of the strong cause test, the court placed considerable emphasis on the element of contractual enforcement. Thus, factors that were reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting would generally carry little or no weight. In particular, the court recast one of the traditional factors in the strong cause test, “whether the defendants genuinely desire trial in the foreign country, or are only seeking procedural advantages”, as an inquiry into whether the party seeking to enforce the choice of court agreement was acting abusively in the context of cross-border litigation. In the view of the court, the genuine desire for trial in the contractual forum has been adequately expressed in the choice of court agreement itself, and it is legitimate to seek the procedural advantages in the contractual forum. The court considered that strong cause would generally need to be established by either proof that the party seeking trial in the contractual forum was acting in an abusive manner (which is said to be a very high threshold), or that the party evading the contractual forum will be denied justice in that forum (ignoring the foreseeable factors), for example if war had broken out in that jurisdiction.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The court left open the question whether the same approach would be taken if the choice of court agreement had not been freely negotiated, taking cognisance of situations, especially in the shipping context, where contracting parties may find themselves bound by clauses the contents of which they have had no prior notice. The court expressed the tentative view that as a matter of consistency, the same approach should be adopted.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal was faced with an unusual clause: “This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China and each of the parties hereto submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China.” The High Court found the choice of law agreement to be meaningless as a purported floating choice of law, and that the choice of court agreement was invalid as it could not be severed from the choice of law agreement. The court then applied the natural forum test and declined to exercise jurisdiction on the basis that China was the clearly more appropriate forum for the dispute. On appeal, the Court of Appeal agreed with the finding that the choice of law agreement was invalid, but held that the choice of court agreement could be severed from the choice of law agreement.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In a prior decision, the Court of Appeal in Orchard Capital I Ltd v Ravindra Kumar Jhunjhunwala [2012] SGCA 16, had considered a non-exclusive choice of court clause to be relevant at the very least as a factor in the natural forum test, and that the weight to be accorded to the factor depended on the circumstances of each case. It also considered that there was another possible approach to such clauses based on contractual enforcement principles, which it did not fully endorse as the parties had not raised arguments based on contractual intentions.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In Shanghai Turbo, the Court of Appeal had to face this issue squarely, and affirmed that if there is a contractual promise in the non-exclusive choice of court clause, the party seeking to breach the agreement had to demonstrate strong cause why it should be allowed to do so. The court went on to hold that, generally, where Singapore contract law is applicable, the “most commercially sensible and reasonable” construction of an agreement to submit, albeit non-exclusively, to a court is that the parties have agreed not to object to the exercise of jurisdiction by the chosen court. This inference does not depend on there being an independent basis for the chosen court to assume jurisdiction (eg, by way of choice of law agreement), or on the number of courts named in the clause. Conversely, there is generally no inference that the parties have agreed that the chosen court is the most appropriate forum to hear the case.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Thus, practically, where there is a non-exclusive choice of Singapore court clause, in general the Singapore will hear the case unless strong cause (the same test elucidated in Vinmar) is demonstrated by the party objecting to the exercise of jurisdiction by the Singapore court, but where there is a non-exclusive choice of foreign court clause, this is merely a factor in the natural forum test, as the party seeking trial in Singapore is not in breach of any agreement. On the facts, the court held that jurisdiction should be exercised because the defendant could not demonstrate strong cause.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is to be noted these are canons of construction under Singapore law. Under Singapore private international law, the choice of court agreement is governed by the law that governs the main contract unless the parties have indicated otherwise. However, Singapore law will apply in default of proof of foreign law. Moreover, canons of construction may be displaced by evidence of contrary intention. The court left open the question – expressing no tentative view – whether the same approach would be taken for contracts which are not freely negotiated. However, as this is a question of interpretation, the context of negotiation could be a relevant indication of the true meaning of contractual terms.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The third case is on arbitration, but the Court of Appeal also made comments relevant to choice of court agreements. In Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd v Hilton International (Maldives) Pvt Ltd [2019] SGCA 10, an injunction was sought to prevent reliance on a foreign judgment obtained in proceedings commenced in breach of an arbitration agreement. The court correctly identified the remedy sought as an anti-enforcement injunction, but nevertheless also discussed the anti-suit injunction because the case was argued on the basis that the injunction sought followed from an entitlement to an anti-suit injunction. The court clarified that an anti-suit injunction would generally be granted to enforce a choice of court agreement unless strong cause is demonstrated why it should be denied, and that there is no need to demonstrate vexatious or oppressive conduct independently. Thus, the law in this area is the mirror image of Vinmar. This case is particularly significant for Singapore because statements in the previous Court of Appeal decision in John Reginald Stott Kirkham v Trane US Inc [2009] SGCA 32 could be read as suggesting that the breach of contract is merely one factor to consider in determining whether the conduct of foreign proceedings abroad was vexatious.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These common law developments are highly significant in bringing greater consistency with developments elsewhere where party autonomy has come to assume tremendous significance. One is the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements which took effect in Singapore law on 1 October 2016. Two critical aspects of this Convention are that a choice of the court of a Contracting State is deemed to be exclusive unless there are express provisions to the contrary, and that the chosen court should assume jurisdiction unless the choice of court clause is invalid. The second is the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) established in 2015. Where there is a choice (whether exclusive or not) of SICC clause, the SICC will assume jurisdiction unless the case is not an appropriate one having regard to the court’s character as an international commercial court. In addition, under the Rules of Court, a choice of the Singapore High Court made on or after 1 October 2016 is presumed to include the SICC unless expressly indicated otherwise. In both situations, the common law is not relevant, and to that extent, the practical effects of Vinmar and Shanghai Turbo will be limited. However, the extent to which anti-suit injunctions will be consistent with the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements remains an open question, and it is certainly an area for watch for further developments.”</div>
<br />
A more detailed discussion of the cases mentioned above can be found at: <a href="https://cebcla.smu.edu.sg/sites/cebcla.smu.edu.sg/files/Paper2019.pdf">https://cebcla.smu.edu.sg/sites/cebcla.smu.edu.sg/files/Paper2019.pdf</a><br />
<br />
Disponível em: <<a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/singapore-court-of-appeal-affirms-party-autonomy-in-choice-of-court-agreements/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29">http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/singapore-court-of-appeal-affirms-party-autonomy-in-choice-of-court-agreements/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29</a>>. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2019.<br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-22854958252516696052019-06-14T08:00:00.000-03:002019-06-14T08:00:08.083-03:00On Human Rights and Majority Politics: Felix Frankfurter's Democratic Theory<div style="text-align: center;">
38 Pages - Posted: 5 Feb 2019 - Last revised: 25 May 2019</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Samuel Moyn</b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Yale University</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Date Written: January 20, 2019</div>
<br />
<b>Abstract</b><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This symposium piece for the "Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law" is primarily a reading of Felix Frankfurter's dissent in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), attempting to draw some lessons from his theory of majoritarian rights for our own moment of crisis for the human rights movement. The situations then and now are only partly comparable, but Frankfurter's call for allowing democratic processes to self-correct even when elite shortcuts beckon -- including when it comes to defining and protecting rights - provides food for thought.</div>
<br />
Note: This is a first draft; comments welcome.<br />
<br />
MOYN, Samuel. On Human Rights and Majority Politics: Felix Frankfurter's Democratic Theory (January 20, 2019). Disponível em: <<a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3319515">https://ssrn.com/abstract=3319515</a>>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2019.<br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-10993703737774462762019-04-04T23:15:00.000-03:002019-04-04T23:46:45.157-03:00Moreira Gomes & Vilas Boas apoiam o III RIBAMAREm nome da Comissão Organizadora do III RIBAMAR: Temas Emergentes do Direito Internacional Privado, agradecemos a <b>Moreira Gomes & Vilas Boas </b>- Advogados Associados a confiança e o apoio à realização de nosso encontro jurídico.<br />
<br />
Acessem a página do RIBAMAR <a href="https://3ribamar.vpeventos.com/#/">aqui.</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqe1_PR6UCLOyQXH7_shlHhx0reS3AyRX7dnpne6j5lW3muqZXSnpf-KBuU6HnzwrZ4NHvr8X7k8m1TVawvd6bgPfFpRwqaPbsXM-b7_WhjqEL5Mvp_uazMzHzeFZVRTxuNmfNkCRuyrVQ/s1600/Logo+MOREIRA+GOMES+%2526+VILAS+BOAS.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="232" data-original-width="382" height="194" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqe1_PR6UCLOyQXH7_shlHhx0reS3AyRX7dnpne6j5lW3muqZXSnpf-KBuU6HnzwrZ4NHvr8X7k8m1TVawvd6bgPfFpRwqaPbsXM-b7_WhjqEL5Mvp_uazMzHzeFZVRTxuNmfNkCRuyrVQ/s320/Logo+MOREIRA+GOMES+%2526+VILAS+BOAS.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-26501357317056988882019-03-20T08:00:00.000-03:002019-03-20T08:00:07.781-03:00Two Conferences in Brazilby <b>RALF MICHAELS</b> on MARCH 1, 2019<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Two conferences on private international law have been announced for Brazil. From March 13-16, the University of Brasilia will organize a conference on the topic of “Challenges to Private International Law in contemporary society”. Prior to that, I will teach a graduate mini-course on comparative law and private international law on March 11-13.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
And then, on May 15-17, the 3rd international law conference RIBAMAR at the Universidade Estadual do Maranhão will discuss “Emerging Topics in Private International Law.” The program is <a href="https://3ribamar.vpeventos.com/pagina/23-programa%C3%A7%C3%A3o#/">here</a>, instructions for signing up <a href="https://3ribamar.vpeventos.com/nova-inscricao.html#/">here</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Exciting to see that the energy is sustained n Brazil, after the JPIL conference in 2017 in Rio de Janeiro.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Copiado de: <b>Conflict of Laws.net</b>. Disponível em: <<a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/two-conferences-in-brazil/">http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/two-conferences-in-brazil/</a>>. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2019.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4569869516267816117.post-17932898267417539502019-03-18T08:00:00.000-03:002019-03-18T08:00:00.443-03:00Guide on the Law Applicable to International Commercial Contracts in the Americas has been approved by OAS<b>by MAYELA CELIS on MARCH 15, 2019</b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Organization of American States (OAS) has announced that the Inter-American Juridical Committee (CJI) has approved the Guide on the Law Applicable to International Commercial Contracts in the Americas. See the summarized recommendations on p. 6, the actual Guide starts on p. 16.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Rapporteur of the Guide is Dr José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Importantly, one of the recommendations of the Guide is that “OAS Member States, regardless of whether they have or have not ratified, or do or do not intend to ratify the Mexico Convention, are encouraged to consider its solutions for their own domestic legislation, whether by material incorporation, incorporation by reference, or other mechanisms as applicable to their own domestic legal regimes, taking into consideration subsequent developments in the law applicable to international commercial contracts as expressed in the Hague Principles and as described in this Guide.”</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Unfortunately, only two States are parties to the Mexico Convention: Mexico and Venezuela.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
While the OAS Guide takes into consideration and examines both instruments, it should be noted that the official article-by-article Commentary on the Hague Principles is available here.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The OAS news item is available here (Spanish version of the Guide is not yet available).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Copiado de: <<a href="http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/guide-on-the-law-applicable-to-international-commercial-contracts-in-the-americas-has-been-approved-by-oas/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29">http://conflictoflaws.net/2019/guide-on-the-law-applicable-to-international-commercial-contracts-in-the-americas-has-been-approved-by-oas/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+conflictoflaws%2FRSS+%28Conflict+of+Laws+.net%29</a>>. Acesso em 16 mar. 2019.</div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<br /></div>
Rodrigo Bastos Raposohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17508025607142177484noreply@blogger.com0