Páginas

Mostrando postagens com marcador Fragmentation. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Fragmentation. Mostrar todas as postagens

segunda-feira, 22 de agosto de 2016

The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization

Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

August 15, 2016


Abstract:
The new posture of international courts and tribunals is the ‘spirit of systemic harmonisation’, to use the words of the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in Al Dulimi. Fifteen years after then ICJ President’s Gilbert Guillaume’s ‘proliferation’-speech before the UN General Assembly and ten years after publication of the ILC ‘fragmentation’-report, it is time to bury the f-word. Along that line, this paper concentrates on the positive contribution of the new techniques which courts, tribunals and other actors have developed in order to coordinate the various subfields of international law. If these are accompanied by a proper politicization of international law and governance, they are apt to strengthen both the effectiveness and the legitimacy of international law. Ironically, the ongoing ‘harmonisation’ and ‘integration’ within international law could also be conceptualised as a form of procedural constitutionalisation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2823512>. Acesso em 19 ago. 2016.

segunda-feira, 7 de julho de 2014

Article: The Changing Architecture of International Climate Change Law

Stockholm Environment Institute; University of Oxford; VU University Amsterdam

University of Greifswald; Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy

Stockholm Environment Institute

February 28, 2014

Forthcoming in Van Calster, G., Vandenberghe, W., and Reins, L. (eds.), Research Handbook on Climate Change Mitigation Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2014. 

Abstract:

This chapter offers a bird’s eye view of the overall architecture of international climate change law. Following a discussion of the defining features of climate change law, it discusses the origins and development of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and subsequent arrangements adopted under its auspices, notably the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the 2010 Cancún Agreements. The chapter shows that while the UNFCCC process has grown more complex over time – in terms of its rules, institutions and the actors involved – so has international climate change law and governance more generally. It illustrates this argument by drawing attention to six observable trends: (i) the multiplication of international forums addressing climate change; (ii) the softening of commitments; (iii) the changing nature of differentiation; (iv) the utilization of innovative policy instruments; (v) the increasing focus on litigation; and (vi) the growing importance of nonstate actors and transnational governance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2402770>. Acesso em 22 abr. 2014.

sexta-feira, 25 de abril de 2014

Article: Stock Exchange Law: Concept, History, Challenges

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

June 16, 2013


Abstract:

Stock exchange law is a field that is highly influenced by economic, social, and political factors. This makes research on the concept and on the history of stock exchange law an interdisciplinary challenge: researchers have to link studies of lawyers and legal historians with the works of the social sciences’ other branches, such as economic and social history, political economy, and contemporary economics. The number of sources that require investigation and the difficulties of their interdisciplinary analysis may explain why the fundamentals of stock exchange law and, more generally, of capital markets or securities law have received less attention so far than their economic, social, political, and legal weight would call for. 

This article has two purposes. First, we would like to point readers to the concept and history of stock exchange law as an important gap in contemporary research. Second, we hope to inspire such research by presenting a brief overview of the most important factors and events that could form the core of a comprehensive account. For these purposes, we will refrain from summarizing secondary sources, but instead try to bring readers in direct contact with the primary sources that we consider relevant. It goes without saying that our overview will be neither exhaustive nor objective, but rather selective and subjective. 

Part I introduces the reader to the term ‘bourse,’ as stock exchanges are referred to in French, German, and many other languages, as well as the rules that constitute ‘stock exchange law.’ Part II outlines the four stages in the history of stock exchange law: the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Era (A.), Absolutism and Mercantilism (B.), Industrialization (C.), and National Legislation and European Harmonization (D.). Part III highlights four contemporary challenges that policymakers from all over the world currently have to deal with: profit orientation, internationalization, fragmentation, and automation. Part IV concludes with thoughts on the future of stock exchange law. 

Acknowledgement: This article is published in this Research Paper Series with the kind permission of the Virginia Law & Business Review in accordance with its Copyright Agreement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2068574>. Acesso em 20 fev. 2014.